Experience the Quality With Free PSAT Exam Questions That Helps Candidates Pass

The second sentence emphasizes and confirms success, not illustrates a general category. “In fact” works better than “For example.” Choice A correct. B and C distort meaning. D leaves weaker logic. PSAT often tests subtle shifts between “for example” and “in fact.”

“Yet” contrasts praise with caution. Choice B correct. PSAT often uses pivot words to test ability to identify shifts in tone or meaning.

“Yet” pivots to opposition—value vs. cost. Choice B correct. On PSAT, contrast markers commonly balance positives with negatives.

The first sentence identifies a problem: social media spreads misinformation. The second provides a counterpoint: some platforms attempt to fix the problem with fact-checking. The logical relationship is contrast, not example. “For example” implies illustration of the problem, which is misleading. The better transitional phrase is “However,” which signals opposition between problem and response. Thus choice A is correct. Choice B is a tense error but does not address logical clarity. Choice C changes the meaning entirely by suggesting platforms “support” misinformation, contradicting the intent. Choice D (“In contrast”) is close but less precise than “However,” which is the common rhetorical link between a problem and a corrective measure. On PSAT Expression questions, evaluate transitions for the exact logical relationship. Even small shifts in connectors change meaning significantly. Always align the connector with the purpose: addition, contrast, cause/effect, or sequence.

Both sentences show decline, so the second reinforces the first. “In fact” is best. “However” wrongly implies opposition. Choice A correct. On PSAT, general-to-specific reinforcement should use “in fact” or “specifically.”