Experience the Quality With Free LSAT Exam Questions That Helps Candidates Pass

The passage directly links slow recovery to pollution and runoff from cities. Thus the supported inference is that pollution contributes to reduced resilience.

Choice A contradicts the passage. Choice C is too extreme. Choice D contradicts the evidence. LSAT inference questions require restrained answers aligned with text, making B correct.

Choice A shows before-and-after evidence linking cycling to health, supporting causation.

Choice B weakens with a rival cause. Choice C doesn’t refute averages. Choice D is irrelevant. Strengthening questions often rely on outcome changes after intervention—A is correct.

The claim assumes causation from literacy → economy. Choice A shows temporal sequence: after literacy programs, economies grew. This strengthens the argument by providing causal evidence.

Choice B presents reverse causation. Choice C offers another explanation, weakening the claim. Choice D contradicts the reasoning. Strengthening questions reward direct causal evidence, making A correct.

The ad concludes causation simply from correlation: fewer cavities among users. Other factors (like regular dental visits) could explain the difference. Thus, the flaw is assuming correlation proves causation.

Choice A is a subset but less precise here. Choice C is one possible alternative cause, but the general flaw is broader. Choice D mischaracterizes evidence; the claim wasn’t self-report. LSAT flaw questions often center on correlation/causation confusions, making B correct.

Choice A provides longitudinal evidence: starting coffee use reduces symptoms, suggesting causation. This strengthens the researcher’s conclusion.

Choice B weakens by pointing to an alternative cause. Choice C suggests reverse causation but doesn’t strengthen. Choice D is background information. LSAT strengthening questions often look for evidence showing that a change in the independent variable leads to a change in the dependent variable—A fits.